Ambition

  • What was the context in which services were delivered where technology could have made efficiency improvements?
  • Why was technology the most appropriate solution?
  • What goals were set in the implementation and operation of the technology or digital product?
  • How were stakeholders considered and impact assessed?
  • Describe any partnership or collaborative working either with a supplier or other entity.

Outcome

  • Judges are looking for convincing evidence that the use of technology has increased efficiency leading to improved service delivery and better care.
  • Provide evidence that the use of technology has also led to improved experience and improved outcomes. This must have a quantitative aspect but can include qualitative feedback as well.
  • Describe the financial impacts and include value for money assessment.

Spread

  • How has technology been applied beyond departmental, organisational, and local boundaries, or how has the technology implementation impacted other teams and organisations?
  • What efforts have been made to share results?
  • Discuss the scope for further replication or scaling of this initiative in other settings

Value

  • Provide quantitative evidence that the use of technology has led to improved efficiency, and so improved value for money.
  • How has the solution impacted patient and staff experience?
  • Share any other value generated, including unintended benefits, of the project

Involvement

  • Describe and provide testimonial evidence of the working relationship between the technology partner (if relevant) and the NHS organisation that enabled a genuinely co-produced product or service
  • Share how all relevant staff were engaged in the design and implementation of the project, product or service
  • Explain how patients, service users or the community were involved in the planning, development and implementation